Eyeshadow Singles Pixie Dust dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than green
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than green · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Retailer shade note: duochrome aqua with lime green reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sage green with silver pearls
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than green· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
20
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than green · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling sea green with gold reflects
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in New Crop, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Pixie Dust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePixie DustClosest shade matchNew CropHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall68
Colour60%55#4aac97#61c09eSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%70MediumLightSome differenceDepth difference 10.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 69/100Shade match 68/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (33%)
Sephora
