Eyeshadow Singles Suede dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Taupe · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than taupe· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Groundwork, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Suede. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSuedeClosest shade matchGroundworkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#b27257#b17b61Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall22
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 62/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Cannoli, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Suede. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSuedeClosest overall alternativeCannoliHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%83#b27257#bd7a5dClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautySame price
