Eyeshadow Singles Titanium dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Terracotta · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than terracotta· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Grey rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Black rather than terracotta· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Silver rather than terracotta· Glitter rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Silver rather than terracotta · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Grey rather than terracotta· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than terracotta · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic gunmetal grey with sparkling reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than terracotta· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than terracotta · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
21
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
17
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
19
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Black rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
15
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Green rather than terracotta· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than terracotta · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: Dark olive metallic with taupe shimmer/Sage green foil with champagne sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Silver rather than terracotta · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Retailer shade note: smokey chocolate brown shimmer
Violette_Fr PLUME EYESHADOW Feather Matte Veil + Feather Shimmer Veil in Poussière de Lune, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Titanium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTitaniumClosest shade matchPoussière de LuneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall67
Colour60%74#7c7c7e#737172Close colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 6.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 54/100Shade match 67/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $7 more
Walmart
