Eyeshadow Singles Short Stack dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Terracotta · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Copper rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Wild One, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Short Stack. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShort StackClosest shade matchWild OneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#c56a3f#c2663aLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 69/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Object D'Art, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Short Stack. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShort StackClosest overall alternativeObject D'ArtHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#c56a3f#bd6f3eClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Overall match 82/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $4 more
