Eyeshadow Singles Luxury dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Purple · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Berry rather than purple· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than purple · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering rich walnut brown with hidden pearl
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Black Ice, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Luxury. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLuxuryClosest matchBlack IceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%73#604b52#5c4758Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 77/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
