Eyeshadow Singles Mushroom dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: taupe with gold & silver sparkle
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Omega, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Mushroom. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMushroomClosest shade matchOmegaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#bfa18a#c8a993Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumLightCloseDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 66/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Forest Night, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Mushroom. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMushroomClosest overall alternativeForest NightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%91#bfa18a#b99e8cVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 80/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$1 less (11%)
