Eyeshadow Singles Modern Times dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Grey · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 35% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 35% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than grey· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than grey · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in STARCLOUD, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Modern Times. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeModern TimesClosest shade matchSTARCLOUDHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#7e736f#7f7774Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall18
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 64/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Always On Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Stone Fox, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Modern Times. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeModern TimesClosest overall alternativeStone FoxHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%66#7e736f#827378Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
Walmart
