Eyeshadow Singles Petite dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I Am Inspired, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Petite. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePetiteClosest shade matchI Am InspiredHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#e2b09e#e8b3a1Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 69/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Peach Madeline, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Petite. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePetiteClosest overall alternativePeach MadelineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#e2b09e#e7b6a1Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 90/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.