True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 22 Medium Cool dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.6 (3,895)·Light medium · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (34%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
69
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
23
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: beige with neutral undertone for light to medium skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light ivory with cool undertone
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
46
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light-medium with cool pink undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
46
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with cool rosy-peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
25
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
48
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral subtle golden undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
43
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light-medium rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
25
Very close colour · Radiant · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light-medium rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with cool undertones
The closest shade to Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 22 Medium Cool (Light medium · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Too Faced Born This Way Soft Matte Foundation in Seashell, against Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 22 Medium Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade22 Medium CoolClosest shade matchSeashellHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#eca684#edab88Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in NW25, against Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 22 Medium Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade22 Medium CoolClosest overall alternativeNW25How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#eca684#e4a686Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
