True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 44 Deep Warm dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.6 (3,895)·Deep · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (34%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very tan with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: level-two dark with a warm undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
46
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
25
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: dark brown with golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
64
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rich golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (24%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
69
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Tan/Deep with Warm Golden Undertones
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.50 less (62%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
25
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/oily/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 44 Deep Warm (Deep · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 430, against Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 44 Deep Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44 Deep WarmClosest shade match430How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#895025#894f26Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionNot statedNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 82/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Superfix Blur Longwear Foundation in F16.7NW, against Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 44 Deep Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44 Deep WarmClosest overall alternativeF16.7NWHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%93#895025#84502bVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionNot statedDeepNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.